< Back to Insights
Dollar bills | Informer. Vulnerability scanner

How do you spend your security budget wisely?

Your security budget is critical if you want to succeed as a business. If you have a limited budget, how should you spend it?

Should you protect your key assets, or thinly spread your budget over an array of various assets? Let’s explore your cybersecurity budget options.

Option one: protect your key assets

There are two obvious benefits to spending your allotted budget on protecting key assets. Firstly, it ensures that your business has a higher chance of survival should something go wrong. 

The Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure - CPNI - advises you to “identify which assets are critical to your business success, competitive advantage and continuing operation.”[1] These will typically include:

  • People
  • Products
  • Services
  • Processes
  • Premises
  • Information

The second obvious benefit of protecting your most critical assets is that you are more likely to meet legislation and compliance. However, putting all of your eggs in one basket is often risky. It leaves unsecured assets more vulnerable to attack. 

For starters, your key assets have to be accessed by something, such as a system outside of their immediate protection. If someone tries to hack your key assets, they may try and access them through a web of systems that you have failed to secure. 

Do you know what systems have access to your critical assets? For example, the CPNI suggests you look beyond your organisation to suppliers and contractors. 

They argue that you should “establish a full and accurate picture of the impact on your company’s reputation, share price or existence if sensitive internal or customer information were to be stolen.” 

Wherever the data goes, those points need to be protected also. However, by not spending money on employee knowledge, you leave yourself vulnerable to be compromised by the small stuff. 

Considering employee error accounts for most security incidents[3], you may want to think twice before you decide to skip over spending any money on user security awareness training and physical security controls.

Option two: spread your money

Option 2 is all about thinly spreading your budget across many areas. There are obvious benefits to this, including the feeling of being more secure by having all of the ground covered. At least at a baseline level. 

However, this basic level may not be sophisticated enough to pick up the more complex security attacks and hacks. Additionally, you may not be fully investing in the best areas. You may not have fully assessed the risk of each area.

We suggest you spend some time mapping out where your assets are and any attack paths. Check whether your data is segregated and isolated properly and see whether they have adequate security controls applied. 

Option three: Informer

Your third option is to use our very own Informer platform. This offers you peace of mind with its exclusive features, including: 

  1. Round the clock vulnerability management
  2. Attack surface management. Results of discovered assets and vulnerabilities are all housed in one, easy to understand, report
  3. Clear data analysis through detailed dashboards
  4. Report creation and scheduling

Take a demo of Informer today and see how Informer can transform your threat management. In the end, whatever option you choose, it all comes down to your risk appetite and what kind of data you’ve got to protect.

We’re always on hand to help guide you to your best cybersecurity solution.


[1] cpni.gov.uk 

[2] cpni.gov.uk

[3] foley.com

More from

security trends

5 Tips to scale your cyber security

Learn how to adapt your cyber security program as your business and online environments grow.

Read Article >

COVID-19 Impact: Financial services cyber security programs

2020 has seen a sharp increase in cyber security attacks increasing by 33% between January and March.

Read Article >

How machine learning is used in cyber attacks

Machine learning is not only utilised by security professionals, but by adversaries with malicious intent. How are they using this to improve their cyber attacks?

Read Article >